Star Trek (2009) – Film Review

“You are fully capable of deciding your own destiny. The question you face is: Which path will you choose. This is something only you can decide.”

star_trek_movie_poster

Mission: Accomplished.

If J.J. Abrams wanted to revitalize the Star Trek franchise and update its mythos for a new generation, then there’s no question that Star Trek is an unmitigated success. From start to finish there’s a sheen, a bravado, a sensibility that is quite unlike anything Star Trek has seen before. This is nothing short of a high-end, well-produced and crafted, Hollywood blockbuster. It’s fun, it’s funny, and it’s thoroughly entertaining. What the film isn’t, however, is “majestic.” This film goes for flash and flair over subtlety or reflection. It’s an important point because when previous incarnations of Star Trek were at their best, they nearly always incorporated some higher commentary on the human condition. That sensibility is traded for a more visceral character exploration. And action.  And the difference may be a step too far for some Trek fans.

Otherwise, if you like big-budget action-adventure films, with a bit attitude thrown in, Star Trek should fit the bill just about as perfectly as you can get.

Read more »

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country – Film Review

st-06-undiscovered-country

undiscovered_country_poster

overview

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country is the final voyage of the original crew of the Starship Enterprise. That isn’t to say that the characters didn’t reappear again in other films or episodes of Trek. But this was the last time they were on a mission together. As such, the movie holds a great deal of nostalgia – for fans and actors alike. And in many respects, it is a worthy, proper sendoff for such an iconic cast, crew, and series. After three seasons of television and six films, this is quite literally the end. And the movie is quite self-aware of this fact, making the theme of the future, the “Undiscovered Country” central to the story, the characters, and the audience. Put simply, everyone is aware that they are passing on the torch and they strive to do so with dignity, grace, and a lot of adventure. That the movie isn’t especially very good hardly matters in light of how important it is in the vast canon of Star Trek.

Read more »

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier – Film Review

st-05-final-frontier

final_frontier_poster

overview

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is almost unanimously labeled as the very worst Star Trek film ever produced. And, truth be told, it’s almost impossible to dispute such an assessment. It really is a disjointed, awkward, clumsy, campy affair that barely manages to accomplish anything. The film is, simply, mismanaged. But I will say this, I disagree that The Final Frontier is far and away the worst film of the franchise. Put alongside Nemesis, the two films are roughly comparable in their overall failures (and minor successes). The details of the failures and (minor) successes are, of course, slightly different. But the bottom line is that this film is no worse an overall experience than Nemesis.

Read more »

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home – Film Review

st-04-the-voyage-home

voyage_home-poster

overview

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home is quite a departure for the franchise. Without question, it features a relatively lightweight story, plenty of action, and takes place almost entirely away from the Enterprise. The acting and dialogue can sometimes be a bit hokey. Plus, the film drags just a little too much through its middle scenes. The environmentalist message doesn’t wear particularly well. And yet the film remains one of the most entertaining in the entire franchise. Rightfully so. There’s a spirited aura to the film that is simply unquantifiable. The result is a flawed, but classic movie.

Read more »

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock – Film Review

st-03-search-for-spock

search_for_spock-poster

overview

Star Trek III: The Search For Spock is the inevitable continuation of the events that ended in the previous movie. But whereas The Wrath of Khan was movie that was nearly flawless, that was accessible to just about any moviegoer, The Search For Spock not only relies heavily on the previous movie, but also on the assumption that viewers are heavily invested in the characters. More critically, the movie is uneven and unfocused, suffering from some typical Hollywood sequel cliché. That isn’t to say that this is a terrible movie. There are in fact a number of iconic moments. But for the most part, it’s a significant step down from its predecessor.

Read more »

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan – Film Review

st-02-wrath-of-khan

wrath_of_khan_poster

overview

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is a fantastic film. It is quite rightly lauded as the finest Star Trek film to date. From start to finish it enfolds at a vigorous pace, is filled with excellent character development and exploration, touches on a number of profound themes, features an iconic villain, and contains incredibly riveting action sequences. The best news of all is that you don’t even have to be a Star Trek fan to enjoy and appreciate this film. It easily transcends not only the franchise, but the genre as well. But if you do happen to be a Trekkie, this is the movie that you had been waiting for – a true continuation of the mission to boldly go where no one has gone before.

Read more »

Star Trek: The Motion Picture

st-01-motion-picture-01

startrek-motion-picture-poster

overview

Star Trek: The Motion Picture is Star Trek’s version of 2001: A Space Odyssey. From start to finish you can see the influence of Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke – from the design, to the pacing, to the visuals, to the final transcendent scenes. And with this film being the highly anticipated reunion of one of the most beloved casts in television history, it would seem to be a good formula for success. Unfortunately, the surface level story is almost entirely ripped from a previous Trek episode – the glacially paced “The Changeling.” What really proves to be a drag on this particular movie is not only its equally monotonous pace, but its inability to morph Star Trek into a kind of science fiction that is, tonally, quite different. The result is a film which is beautiful from a visual and thematic standpoint, but so plodding and obscure from a narrative standpoint that it ends up being, overall, a below average movie.

Read more »

Star Trek Nemesis

analysis-criticism.gif

I remember, long before Star Trek Nemesis was to be released, I read somewhere that the film’s screenwriter was using Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan as his inspiration for the film. Considering that The Wrath of Khan was the best Trek film ever made, even surpassing First Contact, this was good news. After a period of time passed, I heard that the script was leaked online. I read it, and immediately concluded that the whole thing was a hoax. It had to be. The entire premise, from the villain to the finale, were some of the absolute worst ideas I had ever heard of for a film – let alone for a film from a well-established, highly successful franchise. And as promotional materials began to appear, I continued to hold out hope that, somewhere along the line, someone had made drastic script changes and, somehow, had managed to salvage a respectable outing.

Sadly, such salvation was not to be had.

The fact is, Star Trek Nemesis is an endless parade of contrivances to artificially recreate the deeply personal duel between Captain James T. Kirk and his nemesis, Khan. To do this, the film had to have a villain that could rival Picard in almost every way imaginable. But instead of going back into the vast canon of TNG episodes for that character, as The Wrath of Khan did, the film conjures up a brand new character. It’s not a bad idea except that the conjuring was the epitome of laziness and sci-fi cliché. The villain, a human by the name of Shinzon, was to be … a clone. This, coming in the same calendar year as Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones, no less.

The clone idea becomes even more preposterous when the backstory is revealed. Shinzon turns out to have been part of some bizarre Romulan scheme to replace the real Picard with a clone – as if such a scenario could ever have been plausible, considering the incredible gaps in experience between the clone and the original. And yet, the plan was not only approved, but set into motion. That the plan wasn’t followed through on had nothing to do with plausibility – it was simply jettisoned when a new Romulan administration came to power. So Shinzon was sent to the planet Remus, home to an orc-like race of sub-Romulans, called Remans, to die in slave mines. He survived, but grew to be consumed by bitter hatred. And he plans to unleash that hatred on … Earth. Why Earth and not, say, Romulus? Because he has to be Picard’s villain, that’s why.

It’s such a convoluted construct that I am simply baffled that anyone thought that this would be viable on screen. It isn’t. In fact Shinzon, who happens to be younger, but inexplicably more bald than Picard, is not only a bad contrivance, he’s a walking cliché of a bad guy. Somehow the caricature worked for Khan – most likely because his mania was much more plausible – but it’s utterly ridiculous from Shinzon. Added to the bad history and bad writing, the performance is just as atrocious. Shinzon never comes across as anything other than a raving lunatic. Who wears shoulder pads.

It’s all unfortunate because the clone happens to represent an important archetype: The Shadow. For Picard to confront his dark self (literally) could be the basis for a very compelling story. Indeed, the film is at its most engaging when Shinzon and Picard spar over their “mirror” images of each other. But because Shinzon is so contrived, and so unimaginatively evil, he doesn’t represent a “dark” at all (even though the film tells us that he is supposed to). Plus, by making Shinzon so evil, the film basically says that whether or not we are good or evil comes purely from our own experiences – that there is no inherent “self” – it’s all learned.

As for Shinzon’s plans of retribution, he commands a gargantuan ship called the Scimitar – basically an “invincible” ship which has a perfect cloak, the ability to fire when cloaked, superfast top speed, a biogenic superweapon, and the ability to make tea. It’s the worst possible excess for a film. The sheer size and weaponry evoke laughter, rather than awe. As a frame of reference, think of Spaceball-1 (kudos if you get the reference without having to look it up on google or wikipedia).

As a “mirror” story line, we also get the contrivance of B4 – a heretofore unknown prototype android created by Data’s “father” – Dr. Noonian Soong. B4 turns out to have been planted by Shinzon on some remote planet for the sole purpose of being discovered by the Enterprise, reassembled and then allowed to gain access to vital ship systems. How did Shinzon manage to procure a prototype Data when the entire galaxy would want nothing less than that?

Contrivance.

I’ll give the film credit for trying to work the B4 story into the overall plot – by way of Shinzon’s overwrought plan, and by way of a poetic conclusion to Data’s eventual sacrifice. But the gesture is so clumsily executed – and I’m not talking about the intentionally juvenile performance of B4 – that the whole concept is entirely vapid.

The rest of the film doesn’t far a whole lot better, from the opening scenes in the Romulan Senate, to Shinzon’s moronic scheme, to Super Data, to the final scene between Picard and B4. And when Data commits the ultimate selfless act of sacrificing himself for the ship and the crew, it’s horribly anti-climactic. Data was such a strong character in the series that his demise demanded a sequence that was much better executed. Really, the film plays like a really, really atrocious sample of fan fiction – from someone who is completely clueless about the subject matter.

What, if anything, does the film do right? Well, the wedding ceremony between Riker and Troi was enjoyable for its nostalgia factor – seeing the entire cast altogether again, including Wesley and Guinan (though, Data’s serenade was stretching things a bit). I think kudos should go to the sound crew. I’m not exactly sure how they managed it, but the entire film had a very polished sound – almost like it “shimmered” in the ears. (Work with me, I’m grasping for compliments here.) The visual effects were stunning – easily the best that has ever been seen in Star Trek. And the space battle between the Enterprise, the Scimitar and two Romulan Warbirds was likewise impressive. And I suppose that the various references to the other Trek films and series were nice “easter eggs” for Trekkies.

grade-d.gif

Star Trek Nemesis is simply a very bad movie with a high production budget. The result is a film that looks and sounds impressive, but is otherwise incredibly vacant. Even the underlying “mirror” subtext plays out very poorly because the “mirror” of Shinzon is so cracked and cloudy that nothing can be seen in it. For the life of me, I will never understand how this film has gained as many fans as it has.

Star Trek: Insurrection

analysis-criticism.gif

In spite of several action set pieces, Star Trek: Insurrection is, primarily, a slow moving, thoughtful, and contemplative film. By most accounts, it isn’t a typical Star Trek film – it plays a lot more like a ponderous mid-season, two-part episode. But the truth is, Insurrection is a largely underrated film. The problem is twofold: first, it loses the expectation game; second, it falls exceptionally flat by way of its oftentimes forced humor. Both elements tend to undercut what is, otherwise, a film that provokes deep moral and philosophical questions.

The film’s relatively slow pace is intentional. It allows the audience to experience the idyllic peace enjoyed by the inhabitants of a remote ringed planet . It’s important to establish the settlement as futuristic paradise, so that everyone knows and understands what is at stake once the conflict becomes established. But even after we learn that these people, called the Ba’ku, are going to be forcibly relocated, the film still takes its time. A good many movie-goers may ultimately decide that the pace was too slow – they certainly wouldn’t be wrong to do so – but I happen to appreciate the deliberate approach that the film took.

It’s important because of how the pacing of the film matches the underlying themes. This movie is about “slowing time down,” and being able to appreciate living in the moment. It’s about the Fountain of Youth. It’s about speaking truth to power and fighting against oppression. And ultimately, it is about reconciliation and redemption.

The fact is, the Ba’ku planet, with its miraculous ability to prolong life, repair the body, and imbue residents and visitors with a rejuvenated appreciation for life, is a tremendous temptation. And the forces of evil that descend upon it have a specific agenda, and vendetta. Without our ability to fully and completely empathize with the Ba’ku, a society of a mere 600 souls, the danger would not seem urgent, and, therefore, the film’s themes would not seem as vital. And I think this is where the film loses a great many fans.

Coming on the heels of Star Trek: First Contact, a very dark, almost apocalyptic film with the Borg, Insurrection is, without a doubt, a bit anti-climactic. And because it is slow and ponderous, many viewers may be itching for *something*to happen. And because the film takes its time, dwelling on relatively obscure ideas like the universe within a moment of time, there’s a chance for viewers to simply lose interest.

What ultimately happens, however, is that the episode’s villains, the So’na (why the need for silly apostrophes all over the place, anyway?), are actually the children of the Ba’ku, a race of people, hundreds of years old. They left their parents decades ago, and their bodies have begun to breakdown. So the So’na, and a few Federation conspirators, decide to “collect” the Fountain of Youth from the Ba’ku planet. But in order to do so, they will render the planet uninhabitable for generations. So the plan is hatched to forcibly remove the Ba’ku so that the So’na can be healed, and the billions of inhabitants in the Federation can enjoy the fruits of everlasting youth and vitality.

Of course, this sets up the film’s central morality lesson: do the needs (or wants) of the many outweigh the needs (or wants) of the few? Picard and the Enterprise crew seem to think that the Ba’ku are worth the fight, and so their insurrection begins when they defy the orders of the ranking Federation Admiral who is overseeing the project.

The conflict becomes the main focus of the final third of the film, but that doesn’t mean that all of the thematic elements are ignored. Picard shares a “frozen moment” with a woman, named Anij. Their interactions, and romance, are entirely plausible. But even more importantly, they symbolize what the film is all about: finding the Fountain of Youth *within* ourselves, and not through some scientific process.

Sprinkled throughout the film is a myriad of minor character revelations, all related to the idea of reclaiming a part of youth, or in some cases claiming a youth that never existed. Worf (in one of the worst attempts at humor in the film) is going through Klingon adolescence. Troi and Riker revisit their relationship — Riker even gets a shave. LaForge’s eyes completely regenerate. And Data learns a little bit about how to be a child.

Riker wonders if the changes will last when they leave the planet. But as Worf says, Riker’s feelings for Troi existed before they arrived. And indeed, the moment resonates for all of the characters, including Picard. The planet may have helped them replenish their own inner youth — but only because that inner youth was there to begin with. And so for characters, and a series, who are aging, it’s an appropriate, and essential revelation.

grade-c-plus.gif

Ultimately, Star Trek: Insurrection is a film that will be enjoyed by fewer fans than it ought to have been. It’s a shame because the only real gaffes come at the expense of forced humor. The film does make you laugh on occasion, but oftentimes the humor just doesn’t work. Along with a relatively weak conflict and some cringeworthy moments, Insurrection doesn’t feel much like a film. But if you can go into it with the proper expectation, that this is a different kind of Star Trek film, you may be pleasantly surprised.

Star Trek: First Contact

analysis-criticism.gif

This is what a Star Trek movie should be like. Star Trek: First Contact is a true tour de force. If you were going to watch just one TNG-era film, this would have to be it. It’s epic. It’s funny. It takes the crew of the Enterprise-E where none of them have gone before. And it has The Borg in a plot that is plausible and compelling, and allows our characters to explore their own humanity. Suffice to say that not only is this is simply one of the best Star Trek movies ever made, it’s a worthwhile film for any movie fan.

If “The Best of Both Worlds” was worthy of being a movie, then common sense would say that only a movie could do justice to another full confrontation with The Borg. True, the series returned to The Borg as characters, but this is the second wave of invasion that has haunted the Federation’s footsteps ever since the epic, two-part episode. With that in mind, First Contact had a LOT to live up to. While it doesn’t quite reach the same levels of success that “The Best of Both Worlds” achieved, First Contact is pretty damned close.

From the opening revelation that the Borg have returned, the film does an excellent job of creating a palpable sense of danger. And it is this impending doom that helps propel the movie through its various twists and turns.  We start with a Borg offensive, witness an impressive space battle, and then travel back in time to Earth, where the Borg are attempting to assimilate a weaker, less advanced human civilization.  The pacing is particularly well done, allowing for scenes to convey their full range of emotion — such Picard’s “debate” with Lilly, or the Borg Queen’s temptation of Data — without becoming labored or plodding.

And that’s what drives this film — it’s range of emotion. Whereas Star Trek Generations tried to provide a commentary on emotion, First Contact allows emotions to provide a commentary — on characters, ideas, and actions. The two main emotional storylines center on Picard and Data. Picard’s story is one of revenge, while Data’s is one of temptation. The subplot in which Zefram Cochran rises above his own imperfections to become a hero of humanity is also quite compelling. The result is a film that is accessible to not only fans of Star Trek, but also to anyone who enjoys a good story.

Within the Star Trek canon, Zefram Cochran is the man who invented warp drive (here on Earth, at least).  His invention, and the subsequent encounter with extra-terrestrials, become a turning point in human history — transforming years of strife and hunger into the more idyllic society envisioned by series creator Gene Roddenberry.  But Cochran is not a “great” man.  He is, simply, human.  His invention was created to gain access to women and money — not at all the lofty results which transpire.  And so watching this great “hero” as just a man is quite compelling.  It’s a lesson that anyone can change the world.

It’s a lesson that Data and Picard knows well — as does the Borg Queen. The Borg Queen was an ingenious invention for the story.  Her presence gives the Borg a “face” (literally), which allows them to have a better presence on screen than simply “zombies.”  She realizes that, in spite of the hive mentality, her individuality gives strength to the Borg.  It is part of the reason Picard was singled out in “The Best of Both Worlds” and it is the reason that Data is singled out in First Contact.  The Borg Queen tries to tempt Data with flesh — literally — and it makes for a fascinating (and eerily quasi-erotic) series of exchanges between the two characters.

As for Picard, he has certainly not forgotten the horrors he faced at the hands of the Borg when he was transformed into Locutus.  But before he can defeat the Borg, he must confront his own worst enemy: himself.  Picard’s obsession nearly leads to the loss of everyone on board the ship, as well as the future of humanity.  But the character of Lilly becomes a kind of mirror for Picard, allowing him to see the destructive power of his rampant anger.  The use of Moby Dick, as a symboli (and literal) plot device is particularly well done.

All of which helps the story become something more than just a “time travel” and “zombie” film.

That First Contact makes a concerted effort to be a time travel story was a cause for concern. While usually very interesting, time travel stories are difficult to pull off with any measure of success. “Yesterday’s Enterprise” is an example of the success. But something like “Time Squared” or “Time’s Arrow” are examples of how such stories can be either preposterous, or boring. I have to credit the film’s writers, Ronald D. Moore, Brannon Braga, and Rick Berman, for crafting a story that takes us to a time that is not only compelling, but also perfectly Star Trek: humanity’s first encounter with an alien species.

That the aliens turn out to be Vulcans was a masterstroke of genius. It meant that the film was not only entertaining and well-crafted — but that it also added heavily to the Star Trek mythos. So when the film ends, and we hear that familiar fanfare, we know that we have experienced not just a classic film, but classic Star Trek, as well.

grade-a.gif

Star Trek: First Contact is a transcendent film.  You can watch (and enjoy) it without ever having seen a single moment of The Next Generation.  But for fans of TNG, there is a wealth of material to enjoy — from Data’s continued queries to be more human, to the cameo of Lieutenant Barclay.  About the only criticism I have has to do with the Enterprise-E.  Obviously this film needed to contend with the fact that the Enterprise-D was foolishly destroyed in Star Trek Generations.  But I would have preferred a “new” ship that looked exactly like the old one (save for a handful of addons).  The new Enterprise is certainly impressive, and I enjoy it on-screen.  But without the old ship, there was something missing.

Copyright © 2007 - 2009 Star Trek Reviews | All Rights Reserved
Star Trek Reviews is powered by WordPress
Back To Top